You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Considering the practical implementation of constructivist grounded theory in a study of widening participation in Irish higher education
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1080/13645579.2014.923622 |
Authors |
Elaine Keane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
Ireland | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 32% |
Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 45 | 41% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 8% |
Psychology | 9 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 9 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,731,197
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Social Research Methodology
#481
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,290
of 235,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Social Research Methodology
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.