You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Isolation of Live Fibroblasts by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 13 |
Book title |
Fibrosis
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7113-8_13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7112-1, 978-1-4939-7113-8
|
Authors |
Tripp Leavitt, Michael S. Hu, Michael T. Longaker, Leavitt, Tripp, Hu, Michael S., Longaker, Michael T. |
Abstract |
Flow cytometry is a powerful tool in cell biology in that it allows real-time characterization of cellular phenotypes. Additionally, through the process of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), living cells can be isolated for future in vitro experiments, including single cell analysis. Here we describe the isolation of live fibroblasts from the dermis of the skin in mice using FACS. This method circumvents the need for ex vivo expansion in cell culture, which can alter phenotypic and functional characteristics of cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 21% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,954
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,385
of 421,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#693
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.