↓ Skip to main content

Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Sex Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Neurology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
63 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
501 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
549 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Sex Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-analysis
Published in
JAMA Neurology, October 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott C. Neu, Judy Pa, Walter Kukull, Duane Beekly, Amanda Kuzma, Prabhakaran Gangadharan, Li-San Wang, Klaus Romero, Stephen P. Arneric, Alberto Redolfi, Daniele Orlandi, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Rhoda Au, Sherral Devine, Sanford Auerbach, Ana Espinosa, Mercè Boada, Agustín Ruiz, Sterling C. Johnson, Rebecca Koscik, Jiun-Jie Wang, Wen-Chuin Hsu, Yao-Liang Chen, Arthur W. Toga

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 549 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 15%
Researcher 74 13%
Student > Bachelor 59 11%
Student > Master 53 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 5%
Other 72 13%
Unknown 179 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 92 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 9%
Psychology 32 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 4%
Other 72 13%
Unknown 222 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2024.
All research outputs
#185,380
of 26,797,970 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#242
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,690
of 335,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#6
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,797,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.