↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota and neurodevelopmental windows: implications for brain disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Molecular Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
21 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
835 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1626 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbiota and neurodevelopmental windows: implications for brain disorders
Published in
Trends in Molecular Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.05.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuliya E. Borre, Gerard W. O’Keeffe, Gerard Clarke, Catherine Stanton, Timothy G. Dinan, John F. Cryan

Abstract

Gut microbiota is essential to human health, playing a major role in the bidirectional communication between the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. The microbiota undergoes a vigorous process of development throughout the lifespan and establishes its symbiotic rapport with the host early in life. Early life perturbations of the developing gut microbiota can impact neurodevelopment and potentially lead to adverse mental health outcomes later in life. This review compares the parallel early development of the intestinal microbiota and the nervous system. The concept of parallel and interacting microbial-neural critical windows opens new avenues for developing novel microbiota-modulating based therapeutic interventions in early life to combat neurodevelopmental deficits and brain disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,626 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1593 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 260 16%
Student > Master 244 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 216 13%
Researcher 202 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 83 5%
Other 271 17%
Unknown 350 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 272 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 255 16%
Neuroscience 186 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 162 10%
Psychology 83 5%
Other 254 16%
Unknown 414 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,004,171
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#94
of 1,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,516
of 246,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.