The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of different nursing handover styles for ensuring continuity of information in hospitalised patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009979.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marian Smeulers, Cees Lucas, Hester Vermeulen |
Abstract |
An accurate handover of clinical information is of great importance to continuity and safety of care. If clinically relevant information is not shared accurately and in a timely manner it may lead to adverse events, delays in treatment and diagnosis, inappropriate treatment and omission of care. During the last decade the call for interventions to improve handovers has increased. These interventions aim to reduce the risk of miscommunication, misunderstanding and the omission of critical information. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 13 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 20% |
Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 609 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 124 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 100 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 5% |
Researcher | 31 | 5% |
Other | 83 | 13% |
Unknown | 208 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 196 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 4% |
Psychology | 17 | 3% |
Computer Science | 10 | 2% |
Other | 57 | 9% |
Unknown | 220 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,534,760
of 26,607,108 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,070
of 13,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,363
of 243,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,607,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.