↓ Skip to main content

Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
622 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006657.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca Pluess, Frank C Tanser, Christian Lengeler, Brian L Sharp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 622 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 606 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 113 18%
Researcher 100 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 12%
Student > Bachelor 75 12%
Student > Postgraduate 35 6%
Other 98 16%
Unknown 124 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 7%
Social Sciences 27 4%
Other 101 16%
Unknown 144 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,071,410
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,378
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,293
of 102,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.