↓ Skip to main content

Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006657.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca Pluess, Frank C Tanser, Christian Lengeler, Brian L Sharp

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Belgium 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 452 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 22%
Researcher 82 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 13%
Student > Bachelor 58 12%
Student > Postgraduate 29 6%
Other 87 19%
Unknown 47 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 9%
Social Sciences 30 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 6%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 60 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,114,070
of 13,778,239 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,322
of 10,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,266
of 199,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,778,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.