John Gilbey, Jamie Coughlan, Vidar Wennevik, Paulo Prodöhl, Jamie R Stevens, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz, Dennis Ensing, Eef Cauwelier, Corrine Cherbonnel, Sofia Consuegra, Mark W Coulson, Tom F Cross, Walter Crozier, Eileen Dillane, Jonathan S Ellis, Eva García-Vázquez, Andrew M Griffiths, Sigurdur Gudjonsson, Kjetil Hindar, Sten Karlsson, David Knox, Gonzalo Machado-Schiaffino, Dorte Meldrup, Einar Eg Nielsen, Kristinn Ólafsson, Craig R Primmer, Sergey Prusov, Lee Stradmeyer, Juha-Pekka Vähä, Alexey Je Veselov, Lucy M I Webster, Philip McGinnity, Eric Verspoor, Handling editor: W. Stewart Grant
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,570,161
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from ICES Journal of Marine Science / Journal du Conseil
#1,123
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,200
of 332,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICES Journal of Marine Science / Journal du Conseil
#27
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
