You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Smartphone technologies and Bayesian networks to assess shorebird habitat selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wsb.820 |
| Authors |
Sara L. Zeigler, E. Robert Thieler, Benjamin T. Gutierrez, Nathaniel G. Plant, Megan Hines, James D. Fraser, Daniel H. Catlin, Sarah M. Karpanty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,238,304
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#91
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,125
of 328,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.