↓ Skip to main content

Prospective study of patients with persistent symptoms of dengue in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective study of patients with persistent symptoms of dengue in Brazil
Published in
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, September 2017
DOI 10.1590/s1678-9946201759065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana de Almeida Silva Teixeira, Fabiana Prado dos Santos Nogueira, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira Nascentes

Abstract

Dengue is an arboviral infection clinically recognized as an acute and self-limited disease. Persistence of dengue symptoms is known, but it has been little studied. The aim of this study was to characterize persistent symptoms in 113 patients with dengue followed up clinically and by laboratory testing at a tertiary hospital. Symptoms that persisted for more than 14 days were observed in 61 (54.0%) patients, and six (6.2%) of them had symptoms for 6 months or more. The persistent symptoms identified were myalgia, weakness, hair loss, memory loss, reduced resistance to physical effort, headache, reasoning problems, arthralgia, sleepiness- and emotional lability. The progression to persistent symptoms was significantly associated with hospitalization, older age, more severe disease, the presence of bleeding and comorbidities upon univariate analysis. Upon multivariate analysis, the presence of persistent symptoms continued to be significantly associated only with increased age and dengue with warning signs. The platelet count during the acute phase of the disease was significantly lower in the group with persistent symptoms. In conclusion, the frequency of progression to persistent symptoms in dengue is relevant in patients seen at a tertiary hospital and the persistence of symptoms is more common in patients with dengue with warning signs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,963,239
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#647
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,761
of 324,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.