Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, September 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 439)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 4 blogs
twitter: 26 X users

peer_reviews: 1 peer review site
facebook: 1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation: 33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 47 Mendeley

Summary Blogs X Peer reviews Facebook Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 26 X posts from 26 X users, with an upper bound of 169,411 followers.

is #peerreview type in #Academia #discipline related? Could single blind review suit better certain disciplines than others? https://t.co/OrsyFSoC0i

30 Jan 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

Came across this editorial where BMC surveyed the ed board of BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology to find their preferred peer review model, board members named 'open review' the least popular, BMC announced they were staying with open review regardless. htt

29 Nov 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

argument for open idnty & public revs. missing refs to literature on this topic :/. see eg https://t.co/G6SqEZ6hs8 https://t.co/cSFKZZMBoH https://t.co/1HhwcPveYt

08 Dec 2016

Reply Repost Favourite

Open!!! http://t.co/l6PKYGvKnw

26 Nov 2014

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 22 additional X posts.