↓ Skip to main content

Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Setting the Stage for Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences : Trends in Validation Practices
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Standards and Guidelines for Validation Practices: Development and Evaluation of Measurement Instruments
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Reporting of Measurement Validity in Articles Published in Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Research Synthesis of Validation Practices Used to Evaluate the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Validation Practices in Counseling: Major Journals, Mattering Instruments, and the Kuder Occupational Interest Survey (KOIS)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 What Counts as Evidence: A Review of Validity Studies in Educational and Psychological Measurement
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A Review of Validity Evidence Presented in the Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (2002–2012): Misconceptions and Recommendations for Validation Research
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): A Review of the Reported Validity Evidence
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Validity Theory and Validity Evidence for Scores Derived from the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Synthesis of Validation Practices in Two Assessment Journals: Psychological Assessment and the European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Reporting of Measurement Validity in Articles Published in Quality of Life Research
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Validity Evidence for a Perceived Social Support Measure in a Population Health Context
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL) Assessment: Reporting of Psychometric Validity Evidence
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Reporting of Validity Evidence in the Field of Health Care: A Focus on Papers Published in Value in Health
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Validation Practices of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 (Mis)Alignment of Medical Education Validation Research with Contemporary Validity Theory: The Mini-CEX as an Example
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Validation Practices in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences: A Synthesis of Syntheses
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Reflections on Validation Practices in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences
Attention for Chapter 8: A Review of Validity Evidence Presented in the Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (2002–2012): Misconceptions and Recommendations for Validation Research
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Review of Validity Evidence Presented in the Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (2002–2012): Misconceptions and Recommendations for Validation Research
Chapter number 8
Book title
Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences
Published in
Social Indicators Research Series, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9_8
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-907793-2, 978-3-31-907794-9
Authors

Katie E. Gunnell, Benjamin J. I. Schellenberg, Philip M. Wilson, Peter R. E. Crocker, Diane E. Mack, Bruno D. Zumbo, Gunnell, Katie E., Schellenberg, Benjamin J. I., Wilson, Philip M., Crocker, Peter R. E., Mack, Diane E., Zumbo, Bruno D.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research Series
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,825
of 408,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research Series
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them