↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of Medications on Male Fertility

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors (PDE Inhibitors) and Male Reproduction
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors (PDE Inhibitors) and Male Reproduction
Chapter number 5
Book title
Impacts of Medications on Male Fertility
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69535-8_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-969534-1, 978-3-31-969535-8
Authors

Erma Z. Drobnis, Ajay K. Nangia

Abstract

The nonspecific PDE inhibitors, particularly the methylxanthines: caffeine, pentoxifylline (PTX), and theophylline, are known to stimulate sperm motility in vitro and have been used to treat sperm prior to insemination. The in vivo effects are less dramatic. A beneficial effect of caffeine, which is a constituent of some medications, remains controversial. Very high doses of caffeine do have negative effects on fertility endpoints in men and experimental species. The specific PDE5 inhibitors, particularly sildenafil and tadalafil, are prescribed for erectile dysfunction, as well as pulmonary hypertension, lower urinary tract symptoms, and premature ejaculation. PDE5 is expressed throughout the contractile tissues of the male reproductive tract, generally increasing contractility. Some PDE5 inhibitors tend to increase circulating testosterone levels somewhat. For short-term exposure consistent with use prior to intercourse, there appears to be minimal effects on semen quality. Several large, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in healthy men have not found adverse effects of long-term use of these drugs on semen quality. RCTs in infertile men have demonstrated a modest increase in semen quality. Animal studies at human equivalent doses (HED) have produced similar results in young males, but a study in aging male rats found progressive decreases in epididymal sperm quality accompanied by consistent degeneration of the seminal tubules suggesting that studies in older men might be warranted. A concerning study in mice found lower fertilization rates in males treated with HED of sildenafil and mated the next day to untreated females than for control males. Fertility studies in humans are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 23%
Researcher 8 17%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,486,175
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,515
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,375
of 421,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#235
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.