The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exploring cross-sectional associations between common childhood illness, housing and social conditions in remote Australian Aboriginal communities
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-147 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ross Bailie, Matthew Stevens, Elizabeth McDonald, David Brewster, Steve Guthridge |
Abstract |
There is limited epidemiological research that provides insight into the complex web of causative and moderating factors that links housing conditions to a variety of poor health outcomes. This study explores the relationship between housing conditions (with a primary focus on the functional state of infrastructure) and common childhood illness in remote Australian Aboriginal communities for the purpose of informing development of housing interventions to improve child health. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Malawi | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 16% |
Researcher | 15 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 29 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,778,720
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,207
of 14,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,426
of 94,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#18
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.