You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral administration of morphine versus ibuprofen to manage postfracture pain in children: a randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.140907 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naveen Poonai, Gina Bhullar, Kangrui Lin, Adam Papini, David Mainprize, Jocelyn Howard, John Teefy, Michelle Bale, Cindy Langford, Rodrick Lim, Larry Stitt, Michael J Rieder, Samina Ali |
| Abstract |
Recent warnings from Health Canada regarding codeine for children have led to increased use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and morphine for common injuries such as fractures. Our objective was to determine whether morphine administered orally has superior efficacy to ibuprofen in fracture-related pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 19% |
| Canada | 8 | 17% |
| Spain | 8 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 21% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 22% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#196,591
of 25,118,194 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#358
of 9,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,824
of 266,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#6
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,118,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.