↓ Skip to main content

Systems Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Systems Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Conceptual Challenges in the Theoretical Foundations of Systems Biology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 An Integrative Approach Toward Biology, Organisms, and Cancer
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Conceptual Challenges of the Systemic Approach in Understanding Cell Differentiation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Primer on Mathematical Modeling in the Study of Organisms and Their Parts
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Search for System’s Parameters
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Inverse Problems in Systems Biology: A Critical Review
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Systems Biology Approach and Mathematical Modeling for Analyzing Phase-Space Switch During Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Parameters Estimation in Phase-Space Landscape Reconstruction of Cell Fate: A Systems Biology Approach
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Complexity of Biochemical and Genetic Responses Reduced Using Simple Theoretical Models
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Systems Biology Modeling of Nonlinear Cancer Dynamics
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Endogenous Molecular-Cellular Network Cancer Theory: A Systems Biology Approach
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Network-Based Integrative Workflow to Unravel Mechanisms Underlying Disease Progression
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Spatiotemporal Fluctuation Analysis of Molecular Diffusion Laws in Live-Cell Membranes
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Method for Cross-Species Visualization and Analysis of RNA-Sequence Data
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Multi-agent Simulations of Population Behavior: A Promising Tool for Systems Biology
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Metabolomics: Challenges and Opportunities in Systems Biology Studies
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Systems Biology-Driven Hypotheses Tested In Vivo: The Need to Advancing Molecular Imaging Tools
Attention for Chapter 12: A Network-Based Integrative Workflow to Unravel Mechanisms Underlying Disease Progression
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Network-Based Integrative Workflow to Unravel Mechanisms Underlying Disease Progression
Chapter number 12
Book title
Systems Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7456-6_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7455-9, 978-1-4939-7456-6
Authors

Faiz M. Khan, Mehdi Sadeghi, Shailendra K. Gupta, Olaf Wolkenhauer

Abstract

Unraveling mechanisms underlying diseases has motivated the development of systems biology approaches. The key challenges for the development of mathematical models and computational tool are (1) the size of molecular networks, (2) the nonlinear nature of spatio-temporal interactions, and (3) feedback loops in the structure of interaction networks. We here propose an integrative workflow that combines structural analyses of networks, high-throughput data, and mechanistic modeling. As an illustration of the workflow, we use prostate cancer as a case study with the aim of identifying key functional components associated with primary to metastasis transitions. Analysis carried out by the workflow revealed that HOXD10, BCL2, and PGR are the most important factors affected in primary prostate samples, whereas, in the metastatic state, STAT3, JUN, and JUNB are playing a central role. The identified key elements of each network are validated using patient survival analysis. The workflow presented here allows experimentalists to use heterogeneous data sources for the identification of diagnostic and prognostic signatures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,001
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,962
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,471
of 442,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.