↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for K-12 Science Education

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'A Framework for K-12 Science Education'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 8,755)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1835 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Framework for K-12 Science Education
Published by
The National Academies Press, February 2012
DOI 10.17226/13165
ISBNs
978-0-309-21742-2, 978-0-309-21442-1, 978-0-309-21443-8, 978-0-309-21446-9, 978-0-309-21445-2
Authors

Committee on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards; National Research Council, Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards; Board on Science Education; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council, James W. Pellegrino, Mark R. Wilson, Judith A. Koenig, and Alexandra S. Beatty, Editors; Committee on Developing Assessments of Science Proficiency in K-12; Board on Testing and Assessment; Board on Science Education; Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council, National Research Council

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 779 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,835 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 92 5%
Spain 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Other 14 <1%
Unknown 1708 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 430 23%
Student > Master 276 15%
Researcher 228 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 182 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 119 6%
Other 388 21%
Unknown 212 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 731 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 6%
Chemistry 102 6%
Physics and Astronomy 94 5%
Engineering 88 5%
Other 439 24%
Unknown 277 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 850. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#10,240
of 17,076,095 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#49
of 8,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98
of 313,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,076,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.