↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for K-12 Science Education

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'A Framework for K-12 Science Education'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 8,655)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1748 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Framework for K-12 Science Education
Published by
The National Academies Press, February 2012
DOI 10.17226/13165
ISBNs
978-0-309-21742-2, 978-0-309-21442-1, 978-0-309-21443-8, 978-0-309-21446-9, 978-0-309-21445-2
Authors

Committee on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards; National Research Council, Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards; Board on Science Education; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council, James W. Pellegrino, Mark R. Wilson, Judith A. Koenig, and Alexandra S. Beatty, Editors; Committee on Developing Assessments of Science Proficiency in K-12; Board on Testing and Assessment; Board on Science Education; Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council, National Research Council

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 775 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,748 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 92 5%
Spain 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Other 14 <1%
Unknown 1621 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 414 24%
Student > Master 261 15%
Researcher 222 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 176 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 119 7%
Other 369 21%
Unknown 187 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 716 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 6%
Chemistry 95 5%
Physics and Astronomy 87 5%
Engineering 85 5%
Other 415 24%
Unknown 246 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 841. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#9,606
of 16,258,335 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#47
of 8,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99
of 310,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,258,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.