I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/HmXrA2ppGX
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
@eastonrwhite Maybe this is helpful (haven't read it) http://t.co/TMqlLG8WBn
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
I'm over the moon! The great David Cox described my P vlaue paper as "insightful and well worth emphasizing" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/akjnWJPbFT
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
@CameronNeylon Not just hacking. More important, P values don't tell you what you want to know http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @ersatzben @RickyPo
@CameronNeylon Not just hacking. More important, P values don't tell you what you want to know http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @ersatzben @RickyPo
Misinterpretation of p-values, again and again. http://t.co/vKgjZGTJdO @societyforepi @robertwplatt @IJEeditorial Via @david_colquhoun
Misinterpretation of p-values, again and again. http://t.co/vKgjZGTJdO @societyforepi @robertwplatt @IJEeditorial Via @david_colquhoun
Misinterpretation of p-values, again and again. http://t.co/vKgjZGTJdO @societyforepi @robertwplatt @IJEeditorial Via @david_colquhoun
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
Misinterpretation of p-values, again and again. http://t.co/vKgjZGTJdO @societyforepi @robertwplatt @IJEeditorial Via @david_colquhoun
Misinterpretation of p-values, again and again. http://t.co/vKgjZGTJdO @societyforepi @robertwplatt @IJEeditorial Via @david_colquhoun
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
Impressive @david_colquhoun @royalsociety piece on false-discovery rate via P-Values: http://t.co/8V2qJBQRXk @RetractionWatch @methodsmanmd
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
Impressive @david_colquhoun @royalsociety piece on false-discovery rate via P-Values: http://t.co/8V2qJBQRXk @RetractionWatch @methodsmanmd
Oops! Using p=0.05 cutoff for "significant" & not a key reason nutrition "science" full of misinfo: http://t.co/8V2qJC8tlU @david_colquhoun
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
Got an email from David Cox, perhaps the greatest living statistician. If he approves of http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj I'm very happy indeed
@brightonUQ2015 Further to class discussion yesterday. see section 3. The screening problem. http://t.co/8BywiLX1fX
@brightonUQ2015 Further to class discussion yesterday. see section 3. The screening problem. http://t.co/8BywiLX1fX
@brightonUQ2015 Further to class discussion yesterday. see section 3. The screening problem. http://t.co/8BywiLX1fX
Statistical power or the lack of. A good paper I read recently. http://t.co/ldQ4td4peV
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/W9hl4GbeH9
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/U351NcOaWk
@R_Trotta underpowered study on implausible hyopothesis would have huge false positive rate http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
Good to see @david_colquhoun today talking on his much-disc'd (& tweeted!) paper on p-values & false discovery rates: http://t.co/7leAC8Tyqn
@avigotsky quite right "never, ever, use the words "sginficant or non-sug" http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time:... http://t.co/JPct8Szbrc
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/zqLjJ681sG
@HomeopathicDana You night like to try this (though it may be a bit too technical for you) http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @6x10E23
@HomeopathicDana You night like to try this (though it may be a bit too technical for you) http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @6x10E23
@HomeopathicDana You night like to try this (though it may be a bit too technical for you) http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @6x10E23
@HomeopathicDana You night like to try this (though it may be a bit too technical for you) http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @6x10E23
just found myself typing 'significant' but thanks to @david_colquhoun will replace with 'worth another look' http://t.co/dvDB23PSUz
just found myself typing 'significant' but thanks to @david_colquhoun will replace with 'worth another look' http://t.co/dvDB23PSUz
just found myself typing 'significant' but thanks to @david_colquhoun will replace with 'worth another look' http://t.co/dvDB23PSUz
just found myself typing 'significant' but thanks to @david_colquhoun will replace with 'worth another look' http://t.co/dvDB23PSUz
just found myself typing 'significant' but thanks to @david_colquhoun will replace with 'worth another look' http://t.co/dvDB23PSUz
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
RT @RSocPublishing: Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/B9Kqtayspo | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
Fantastic article on false discovery rates and misinterpretation of p-values, from @david_colquhoun here http://t.co/CaQk0gPuDp
Reminded by earlier DC tweet that he nailed it, again, a few months back. This is such an important paper. http://t.co/Dt0M0qtPXT
The problem with p <.05. MT @david_colquhoun: RT @RSocPublishing: background reading on p-values http://t.co/hl1a7scFOz
RT @RSocPublishing: Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/B9Kqtayspo | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
RT @RSocPublishing: Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/B9Kqtayspo | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
RT @RSocPublishing: Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/B9Kqtayspo | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/6Y6bLwzI4d | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/6Y6bLwzI4d | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/6Y6bLwzI4d | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
Some background reading on p-values during the break http://t.co/6Y6bLwzI4d | #FSSC session reconvenes at 11.30 am
Why most published quantitative research results are wrong http://t.co/kP6Gbjc1Ut David Colquhoun on the misinterpretation of p-values
Why most published quantitative research results are wrong http://t.co/kP6Gbjc1Ut David Colquhoun on the misinterpretation of p-values
Fantastic article on false discovery rates and misinterpretation of p-values, from @david_colquhoun here http://t.co/CaQk0gPuDp
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time": http://t.co/2nxcvGXmLK #science