World statistics day. Do you understand P values? Try https://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR or the video https://t.co/jbEqYdObCQ https://t.co/oIeHDE2q9I
RT @DrSGallagher: A great read: misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/xwIR53HswF @david_colquhoun @RSocPublishing @amcreaven #statistic…
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
@NeilOConnell It's usual for bigger trial sto give smaller effects eg Fig 7 in http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @statsguyuk @Richvn @AmyPricePhD
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values | Open Science http://t.co/Gaw7Z0aIW0
Article doesn't even mention the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj & http://t.co/ypexfWMblt https://t.co/cu9DWV0k5N
.@timothydbowman Deposit them in bin! But I'd like to know why altmetric score for http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj has FALLEN from 975 to 796
RT @ffolliet: On statistics and the p value. So much I don't know http://t.co/lzBOiVBVgW
RT @alexeidrummond: Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" ht…
RT @ffolliet: On statistics and the p value. So much I don't know http://t.co/lzBOiVBVgW
RT @alexeidrummond: Truth about p: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you've made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" ht…
RT @PA_Maday: p-value article.....great information http://t.co/tsjz6Qy4Jr
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @ffolliet: On statistics and the p value. So much I don't know http://t.co/lzBOiVBVgW
p-value article.....great information http://t.co/tsjz6Qy4Jr
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
On statistics and the p value. So much I don't know http://t.co/lzBOiVBVgW
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
RT @david_colquhoun: "The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
"The misinterpretation of P values" just passed 10,000 pdf downloads http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
@cochranecollab be careful about boasting abt altmetric scores. Mine went up to 975 and been falling ever since http://t.co/lFsDIwQi28
RT @david_colquhoun: Heavens Paper on misintpretation of P values reached 80,000 full text views http://t.co/lFsDIx7TqI
Heavens Paper on misintpretation of P values reached 80,000 full text views http://t.co/lFsDIx7TqI
@ThomasArildsen well my P value started on blog, then on arXiv and finally published http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj bur still reviewd for last step
RT @david_colquhoun: @ProfAndyField the logic of P values is impeccable but they answer the wrong question, I think http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
@ProfAndyField the logic of P values is impeccable but they answer the wrong question, I think http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
#moreorless NOW, on reproducibility study -one reason is here http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @TimHarford
RT @david_colquhoun: More confirmation that @altmetric is a joke. This altmetric score FELL from 975 a few weeks ago, to 840 today http://t…
More confirmation that @altmetric is a joke. This altmetric score FELL from 975 a few weeks ago, to 840 today http://t.co/lFsDIwQi28
Gayet önemli: (1) The New Rules of Research https://t.co/sKYyqNh46t (2) ... misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/q3EBZVtCkU
@fidouglas OK maybe you'd prefer full paper to blog http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @MRC_Epid
In general, I think that if you are going to criticise a paper, it's best if you read beyond Fig 2 http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @sampendu @lakens
@lakens @annemscheel it isn't silly -it's all we've got. What one should do is change ther description of P values eg http://t.co/Hb7so63lXL
p = 0.05の結果に基づいて「ある知見を得た」と考えると、その知見は30%の確率で間違っているという論文 http://t.co/xkwPJpNQOy を踏まえた上でp値とどう向き合えば良いのかについてのLakensの記事 https://t.co/WjsD2ryyM2
@david_colquhoun Good explanation why "trends to significance" & p near 0.05 maybe shouldn't mean much at all. Sec4 http://t.co/e44kRU5SjS
.@lakens but everyone uses P values for evidence and to see how often you get misled you need = not < See sec 10 http://t.co/X1NEc1GDCR
Another reason to distrust @altmetric After 10 months of monotonic inc, it's now like a yoyo fell by 100 in 2 weeks http://t.co/lFsDIx7TqI
.@altmetric This is getting silly. The altmetric score at http://t.co/lFsDIx7TqI is like a yoyo and has fallen by 100 in the last 2 weeks!
@Wuchereria1 the full paper is http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj Video http://t.co/jbEqYe5N1q Mjor prob is obseession of senior academics w/ metrics
RT @RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
RT @RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
RT @RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
RT @RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
RT @RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
“@RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/Io9lkPPJCG #COASP #OA” @rfdelrio
RT @RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
RT @RSocPublishing: The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
The misinterpretation of p-values by @david_colquhoun Full paper: http://t.co/ZfggTBTIii #COASP #OA
@altmetric I'm intrigued to understand why the altmetrc score for http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj has FALLEN from 975 to 900 in last week
RT @david_colquhoun: .@krmahtani The false positive rate is NOT 1-specifivity! http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @dnunan79 @DylanRJCollins @CebmOxford…
.@krmahtani The false positive rate is NOT 1-specifivity! http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @dnunan79 @DylanRJCollins @CebmOxford @cebmblog
@krmahtani Oops that is wrong, It isn't the false pos rate! http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @dnunan79 @DylanRJCollins @CebmOxford @cebmblog
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/1v9QBpidob
.@BrendanTHalpin uhuh that app uses P=< 0,05, not P = 0.05 so not answering the question I asked. See http://t.co/fvwZ4THNj8
.@ewanbirney Even without mutliple comparisons, P value still says little about false discovery rate http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @edyong209
@ewanbirney plus misinterpretation of marginal P values http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @JamesPsychol @edyong209
RT @david_colquhoun: Left Royal Statistical Soc meeting puzzled by why statisticians haven't said more about false discovery rate http://t.…
Left Royal Statistical Soc meeting puzzled by why statisticians haven't said more about false discovery rate http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj #RSS2015
@sampendu @lakens @psy_farrell @chchatham @EJWagenmakers There's a paper here that might be of interest: http://t.co/btt1SK4K70
@carlgomb not to mention reliance on mariginal P values http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @GlobalHealthNut
.@BulbousSquidge My bit was essantially in http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @StatsJen @RoyalStatSoc
RT @HannaIsotalus: That seems a bit promiscuous to me. http://t.co/xIzjhJTmiQ #talknerdytome https://t.co/9GzOjV71Ln
Why that's wrong is explained in http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj and in http://t.co/jbEqYe5N1q https://t.co/pnlBoD4Esg
That seems a bit promiscuous to me. http://t.co/xIzjhJTmiQ #talknerdytome https://t.co/9GzOjV71Ln
RT @david_colquhoun: I'll be at @RoyalStatSoc meeting in Exeter 10 Sept, talking about P values and null hyopthesis testing http://t.co/X1N…
RT @david_colquhoun: I'll be at @RoyalStatSoc meeting in Exeter 10 Sept, talking about P values and null hyopthesis testing http://t.co/X1N…
I'll be at @RoyalStatSoc meeting in Exeter 10 Sept, talking about P values and null hyopthesis testing http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj
RT @briandavidearp: An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values | Open Science http://t.co/HFiSD3MINF
RT @briandavidearp: An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values | Open Science http://t.co/HFiSD3MINF
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values | Open Science http://t.co/HFiSD3MINF
.@SimonRKerridge Here's another example -a trivial & non-original review with altmetrics score of 954 http://t.co/lFsDIx7TqI @timeshighered
@Physio_Ben Thanks -it's rare to hear that a paper changed anyone's attitude! http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj @DrMarkBurnley
Wonder what the rate is in Sport Science... http://t.co/x4qkhxpW2C https://t.co/UiRFJ8Ec2u
Worth a second look at this one on the problems with the word "significant" and P values in papers. http://t.co/KJz5ttDfP0
RT @david_colquhoun: A comment my false discoveries paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: A comment my false discoveries paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper htt…
@sarahbrodsky does this work http://t.co/VP42il5X8W
RT @david_colquhoun: A comment my false discoveries paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper htt…
RT @david_colquhoun: A comment my false discoveries paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper htt…
A comment my false discoveries paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj )
RT @david_colquhoun: A criticism of my P value paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper http://t…
On p-values & FDR: i) http://t.co/eguPUQ9Oxw ii) Comment http://t.co/3fswU2kBDg iii) Response http://t.co/rZdeOIIJn0 | via @david_colquhoun
@dbkell Criticism of my P value paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper http://t.co/X1NEc1p2Lj )
RT @david_colquhoun: A criticism of my P value paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper http://t…
RT @david_colquhoun: A criticism of my P value paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper http://t…
p=.05 means 5% of *all* effects are false, but ratio of *false positives* will be much, much higher than 5%... creepy http://t.co/zCmMnJwBTE
RT @david_colquhoun: A criticism of my P value paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper http://t…
RT @david_colquhoun: A criticism of my P value paper http://t.co/H1SuRCY5H7 and my response http://t.co/ARHgQ4leEt (original paper http://t…