.@gmcrotty @elife Thanks it will be out somewhere. It's already on arXiv -journals are increasingly irrelevant. http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
.@gmcrotty @elife Thanks it will be out somewhere. It's already on arXiv -journals are increasingly irrelevant. http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
I'm 100% behind @elife despite the fact they thought my P value paper not wirth publishing. It's now on arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
@hildabast I'd love to get your opinion on http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 if you have time. The more reviewa the better
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
Investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/dxxAhwDUOz via @david_colquhoun
That's from http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
“@david_colquhoun: P value wars...On arXiv http://t.co/POEr2wlHAV”: I'm no statistician but this seems important for us all to understand.
Investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/dxxAhwDUOz via @david_colquhoun
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
Investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/dxxAhwDUOz via @david_colquhoun
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
Investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/dxxAhwDUOz via @david_colquhoun
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
P value wars. My paper updated with a bit about multiple comparisons (top of p4). On arXiv http://t.co/2fDx6As7t8
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/kd9mch2kdz
Investigation of false discovery rate & misinterpretation of P values @david_colquhoun http://t.co/RTNytwhm5t via @arsphysica @sc_k 2m
Always interesting to think about P values. http://t.co/u3NZAvEnA9
Hazards of P values and why it’s important to know your stats! http://t.co/YqDEJE0nbW
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/7GfrLK5n3b
@dieterhochuli well, I'm a frequentist. All probabilities in paper are normal objective probs http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/7GfrLK5n3b
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/7GfrLK5n3b
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/7GfrLK5n3b
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/7GfrLK5n3b
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
@learnfromerror thanks v much. On hols but left brief response + ref to http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8
dare i say significant paper! p<0.001! @chadn737: If you love grumpy papers like I do, then this one takes the prize: http://t.co/yr9h8cAG9j
If you love grumpy papers like I do, then this one takes the prize: http://t.co/tSmhmf9QDh
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/OMbepNzWtv
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/OMbepNzWtv
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/OMbepNzWtv
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/OMbepNzWtv
...the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/M848qUhCXQ by @david_colquhoun
...the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/M848qUhCXQ by @david_colquhoun
And never use the word “significant." @david_colquhoun on the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/gSW5PgOGFk
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/OMbepNzWtv
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/OMbepNzWtv
A nice look at the hazards of using p-values http://t.co/efZ0VpYRJx from @david_colquhoun
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/cQh4oHBLF0
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/cQh4oHBLF0
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/cQh4oHBLF0
@learnfromerror sorry! Section on page 8, RH column http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values. http://t.co/ErDbdaxUJy
The problems with P values, definitively demonstrated by @david_colquhoun. http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
...the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/M848qUhCXQ by @david_colquhoun Ht @tom_siegfried
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values by @David_Colquhoun http://t.co/EyoQGcV2XP
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
An Investigation of the False Discovery Rate and the Misinterpretation of P Values... http://t.co/a0a3A19Cll
"And *never* use the word "significant"." Darf man sich auch als Wissenschaftsjournalist/in merken. http://t.co/iWpulYbtGD Via @Anhaeuser
...the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/pb2f3Kje22 by @david_colquhoun @tom_siegfried (via @medskep)
...the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/pb2f3Kje22 by @david_colquhoun @tom_siegfried (via @medskep)
...the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/M848qUhCXQ by @david_colquhoun Ht @tom_siegfried
@TimBrock_DtD you might want to add a link to http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 ?
@DavidPriceUCL I tried arXiv -went up in 24 hours! Preprint at http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/OMbepNzWtv
@stephensenn haha. Hoping for lots of comments on http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 by time we get back
@lakens I don't claim originality! But I give an R script that makes it easy to simulate 100k t tests with yr numbers http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values by @David_Colquhoun http://t.co/EyoQGcV2XP
"to keep your false discovery rate <5%, use a 3-sigma rule, ...and *never* use the word "significant". http://t.co/EILyCqiAzY
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
"to keep your false discovery rate <5%, use a 3-sigma rule, ...and *never* use the word "significant". http://t.co/EILyCqiAzY
"to keep your false discovery rate <5%, use a 3-sigma rule, ...and *never* use the word "significant". http://t.co/EILyCqiAzY
"to keep your false discovery rate <5%, use a 3-sigma rule, ...and *never* use the word "significant". http://t.co/EILyCqiAzY
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
This p value paper makes you stop and think. Now, how to add to my paediatric pharm sessions? http://t.co/14upH4DjPQ via @david_colquhoun
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
@d_spiegel preprint of my two-penn'orth pn arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of P values http://t.co/mxOYXoFqJw
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
"Als je Pwaarde=.05 gebruikte om te suggereren dat je iets ontdekt hebt, heb je het ten minste 30% van de tijd fout." http://t.co/Li1CWj6joF
"Als je Pwaarde=.05 gebruikte om te suggereren dat je iets ontdekt hebt, heb je het ten minste 30% van de tijd fout." http://t.co/Li1CWj6joF
"Als je Pwaarde=.05 gebruikte om te suggereren dat je iets ontdekt hebt, heb je het ten minste 30% van de tijd fout." http://t.co/Li1CWj6joF
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
RT @tom_siegfried: "If you use P=.05 to suggest you hav made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time." http://t.co/zJV4mmf8Pn
RT @tom_siegfried: "If you use P=.05 to suggest you hav made a discovery, you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time." http://t.co/zJV4mmf8Pn
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy
"If you use P=.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30 percent of the time." http://t.co/BzYmPLEGYy