The misleading nature of p-values @Robertson_SJ @jacquietran @PaulGastin http://t.co/LhweKdTwZh
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
Bayesian analysis and why research is wrong 30% of the time http://t.co/0Dvh6HRAkE #foamed Back to physiology then...
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
Lots of people are saying why Frequentist (p values) approach is dumb, but rarely are they as readable as here: http://t.co/mBiaFlX4Q9
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
Thx MT @glbryson: If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself http://t.co/Kkg0nipAid
Thx MT @glbryson: If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself http://t.co/Kkg0nipAid
Thx MT @glbryson: If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself http://t.co/Kkg0nipAid
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
Thx MT @glbryson: If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself http://t.co/Kkg0nipAid
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
Thx MT @glbryson: If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself http://t.co/Kkg0nipAid
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
@JASportsInjury @ProfJimRichards @soccerresearch watch out for those P values!! #research #goodjobwehaveJimRichards http://t.co/3lcu25FNc1
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
A must read for all researchers. An investigation of the type 1 discovery rate and meaning of p-values. http://t.co/eKHkjMooOH
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
The misleading nature of p-values @Robertson_SJ @jacquietran @PaulGastin http://t.co/LhweKdTwZh
to keep your false discovery rate <5%, use a 3-sigma rule, or insist on p≤0.001. And never use the word ‘significant’ http://t.co/a5Ks9TmUgN
"The misleading nature of p-values" http://t.co/IyHj5SKSCI"
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
Even when you are sufficiently powered, p<.05 means you are making a monkey of yourself 3 times in 10 http://t.co/mBiaFlX4Q9 #RIPFisher
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
Even when you are sufficiently powered, p<.05 means you are making a monkey of yourself 3 times in 10 http://t.co/mBiaFlX4Q9 #RIPFisher
When your study is underpowered (as it nearly always is) your p value of <.05 means you are nearly always wrong http://t.co/mBiaFlX4Q9
Lots of people are saying why Frequentist (p values) approach is dumb, but rarely are they as readable as here: http://t.co/mBiaFlX4Q9
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
I'll never look at p= 0.05 in the same way again. Great article explaining it's weaknesses by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/VVoipWhc7J”
The misleading nature of p-values @Robertson_SJ @jacquietran @PaulGastin http://t.co/LhweKdTwZh
The misleading nature of p-values @Robertson_SJ @jacquietran @PaulGastin http://t.co/LhweKdTwZh
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
I'll never look at p= 0.05 in the same way again. Great article explaining it's weaknesses by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/VVoipWhc7J”
I'll never look at p= 0.05 in the same way again. Great article explaining it's weaknesses by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/VVoipWhc7J”
I'll never look at p= 0.05 in the same way again. Great article explaining it's weaknesses by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/VVoipWhc7J”
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/YrOm22n9v2 Excellent explanation.
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/Q4jG1lpFsm
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/Q4jG1lpFsm
I'll never look at p= 0.05 in the same way again. Great article explaining it's weaknesses by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/VVoipWhc7J”
Pitfalls of P values & snares of statistical significance testing http://t.co/m7mrktMsJD
Pitfalls of P values & snares of statistical significance testing http://t.co/m7mrktMsJD
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/oQHrnb7w2a
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/oQHrnb7w2a
Pitfalls of P values & snares of statistical significance testing http://t.co/m7mrktMsJD
Pitfalls of P values & snares of statistical significance testing http://t.co/m7mrktMsJD
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/xIQkS1mYvp (I like use of tree diagrams)
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/xIQkS1mYvp (I like use of tree diagrams)
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/xIQkS1mYvp (I like use of tree diagrams)
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/r9OQpYphUp
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
Thanks! RT @dbkell: Useful article on false discovery rates by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/MRaC2JIwr8
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time: http://t.co/FIShLk0SyH
Thanks! RT @dbkell: Useful article on false discovery rates by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/MRaC2JIwr8