If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
LRT - This is a nice review, but I think misses the broader point about "truth" v. "result of an experiment." http://t.co/sCwv00vn7w
LRT - This is a nice review, but I think misses the broader point about "truth" v. "result of an experiment." http://t.co/sCwv00vn7w
LRT - This is a nice review, but I think misses the broader point about "truth" v. "result of an experiment." http://t.co/sCwv00vn7w
LRT - This is a nice review, but I think misses the broader point about "truth" v. "result of an experiment." http://t.co/sCwv00vn7w
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. Read this. http://t.co/pT7XCWQ9ih
All you ever wanted to know about the use and abuse of p-values: http://t.co/Yn2pFYOwAu Not really new, but inspiring and entertaining.
Re my talk at Pharm Soc today. Why P values result in many false discoveries/ More details at http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv @dr_fi
@sampendu aha I think you'll have to ask her to read beyond section 4 of http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv All is explained in sections 5 - 11
Re my talk at Pharm Soc today. Why P values result in many false discoveries/ More details at http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv @dr_fi
Re my talk at Pharm Soc today. Why P values result in many false discoveries/ More details at http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv @dr_fi
Re my talk at Pharm Soc today. Why P values result in many false discoveries/ More details at http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv @dr_fi
Re my talk at Pharm Soc today. Why P values result in many false discoveries/ More details at http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv @dr_fi
Re my talk at Pharm Soc today. Why P values result in many false discoveries/ More details at http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv @dr_fi
A misinterpretation of p-values may be leading to a scientific crisis: http://t.co/vOJ0DxHB67 by @david_colquhoun in @royalsociety
A misinterpretation of p-values may be leading to a scientific crisis: http://t.co/vOJ0DxHB67 by @david_colquhoun in @royalsociety
http://t.co/qS7bIVj2ql see below - why we can't always trust p-values...... #science #statistics
@ianwalker @Tamsyn_Ann_x p<0.05, but see section 10 for an interesting discussion http://t.co/jRTTLtOlgB
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values, from @david_colquhoun http://t.co/1RbGQALFPU
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values, from @david_colquhoun http://t.co/1RbGQALFPU
@BigKmassive Thx. More at http://t.co/T7fGNplpJa and http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv
A misinterpretation of p-values may be leading to a scientific crisis: http://t.co/vOJ0DxHB67 by @david_colquhoun in @royalsociety
A misinterpretation of p-values may be leading to a scientific crisis: http://t.co/vOJ0DxHB67 by @david_colquhoun in @royalsociety
A misinterpretation of p-values may be leading to a scientific crisis: http://t.co/vOJ0DxHB67 by @david_colquhoun in @royalsociety
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/XTagmUhnq7
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/XTagmUhnq7
.@david_colquhoun on false discovery rate & misinerpretation of p-values: Use p<0.001 or 3-sigma rule. http://t.co/ZAhgLoXCsA
.@david_colquhoun on false discovery rate & misinerpretation of p-values: Use p<0.001 or 3-sigma rule. http://t.co/ZAhgLoXCsA
.@david_colquhoun on false discovery rate & misinerpretation of p-values: Use p<0.001 or 3-sigma rule. http://t.co/lX7samrTX1
.@david_colquhoun on false discovery rate & misinerpretation of p-values: Use p<0.001 or 3-sigma rule. http://t.co/ZAhgLoXCsA
.@david_colquhoun on false discovery rate & misinerpretation of p-values: Use p<0.001 or 3-sigma rule. http://t.co/fOWck4oOsC
@Maclomaclee looks a bit like Fig 7 in http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv
@Maclomaclee confidence limits tell you nothing at all about false discovery rate! http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv
@Maclomaclee I'm talking about misinterp of P values at BPS. 18 Dec, but don't see how it can be incorp in a metric http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv
@Maclomaclee abd how do you deal with P values? http://t.co/ytbygLI5dv
"publish-or-perish culture values quantity over quality, and has done enormous harm to science" http://t.co/aCoVEmVzpm by @david_colquhoun
Your p-vals are shite, mate: bung 'significance' up ya' bum - p≤.05 only means 'worth anuva look'. Bayes t'rescue(?): http://t.co/shkxXb48RC
I do like it when a stats paper cites XKCD http://t.co/eZOCuqf2LX
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
An investigation of the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/9LtVxZQVzM statistics & failure to replicate
Open Science has accepted my P value paper. Nice, but it's been on arXiv since July http://t.co/YGxPXE0Vx0 #publishingischanging
P value wars! A preprint of my paper is now on arXiv http://t.co/YGxPXEj4L8 I hope lively discussion will ensue
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/XqleopIfOZ
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
If you use p=0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. @statsbeerz http://t.co/SlHqfKDLrW
False discoveries...http://t.co/pW2XTYayHq If you are able to read only one Research Methods paper in 2014, this must surely be the one!
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
False discoveries...http://t.co/pW2XTYayHq If you are able to read only one Research Methods paper in 2014, this must surely be the one!
Great @david_colquhoun article: "An investigation of the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values" http://t.co/2AHvUYUWYV
A favorite question to ask defending grad students: What is a p-value? And I realize I don't (deeply) know myself... http://t.co/mxvY05XuSY
Great @david_colquhoun article: "An investigation of the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values" http://t.co/2AHvUYUWYV
Great @david_colquhoun article: "An investigation of the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values" http://t.co/2AHvUYUWYV
Great @david_colquhoun article: "An investigation of the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values" http://t.co/2AHvUYUWYV
Great @david_colquhoun article: "An investigation of the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values" http://t.co/2AHvUYUWYV
Great @david_colquhoun article: "An investigation of the false discovery rate & the misinterpretation of p-values" http://t.co/2AHvUYUWYV
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
The misleading nature of p-values @Robertson_SJ @jacquietran @PaulGastin http://t.co/LhweKdTwZh
MT via @xtaldave: Great open access paper on sig tests by @david_colquhoun http://t.co/iSrMYma0TA
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
The misleading nature of p-values @Robertson_SJ @jacquietran @PaulGastin http://t.co/LhweKdTwZh
The misleading nature of p-values @Robertson_SJ @jacquietran @PaulGastin http://t.co/LhweKdTwZh
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
“@Sports_Pod: "If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/hEzgbFZ17D”
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values http://t.co/bPgzlXqTgc
I do like it when a stats paper cites XKCD http://t.co/eZOCuqf2LX
I do like it when a stats paper cites XKCD http://t.co/eZOCuqf2LX
I do like it when a stats paper cites XKCD http://t.co/eZOCuqf2LX
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X
If you read or write science read this NOW. @david_colquhoun on P values, making a fool of oneself, and Ioannidis. http://t.co/tWvEQYcusW
"If you use p=0.05 to suggest you have made a discovery then you'll be wrong at least 30% of the time" http://t.co/POa2AsPg2X