↓ Skip to main content

Use of metabotyping for the delivery of personalised nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of metabotyping for the delivery of personalised nutrition
Published in
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/mnfr.201400591
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare B. O'Donovan, Marianne C. Walsh, Anne P. Nugent, Breige McNulty, Janette Walton, Albert Flynn, Michael J. Gibney, Eileen R. Gibney, Lorraine Brennan

Abstract

Personalised nutrition can be defined as dietary advice that is tailored to an individual. In recent years, the concept of targeted nutrition has evolved, which involves delivering specific dietary advice to a group of phenotypically similar individuals or metabotypes. This study examined whether cluster analysis could be used to define metabotypes and developed a strategy for the delivery of targeted dietary advice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
#1,249
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,049
of 360,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.