↓ Skip to main content

Early‐life stress selectively affects gastrointestinal but not behavioral responses in a genetic model of brain–gut axis dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early‐life stress selectively affects gastrointestinal but not behavioral responses in a genetic model of brain–gut axis dysfunction
Published in
Neurogastroenterology & Motility, December 2014
DOI 10.1111/nmo.12486
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. P. Hyland, S. M. O'Mahony, D. O'Malley, C. M. O'Mahony, T. G. Dinan, J. F. Cryan

Abstract

Early-life stress and a genetic predisposition to display an anxiety- and depressive-like phenotype are associated with behavioral and gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction. Animals exposed to early-life stress, and those genetically predisposed to display anxiety or depressive behaviors, have proven useful tools in which to study stress-related GI disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). IBS is a heterogeneous disorder, and likely a consequence of both genetic and environmental factors. However, the combined effects of early-life stress and a genetic predisposition to display anxiety- and depression-like behaviors on GI function have not been investigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Neuroscience 13 15%
Psychology 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,398,500
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#1,199
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,231
of 371,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.