↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
63 X users
facebook
33 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007366.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Kim Jackson, Jo Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 427 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 14%
Student > Master 51 12%
Researcher 38 9%
Student > Postgraduate 24 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Other 92 21%
Unknown 141 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 101 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 96 22%
Social Sciences 20 5%
Psychology 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 150 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#664,729
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,155
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,871
of 363,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.