↓ Skip to main content

Radiometric Cross Calibration of Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+)

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiometric Cross Calibration of Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+)
Published in
Remote Sensing, December 2014
DOI 10.3390/rs61212619
Authors

Nischal Mishra, Md Haque, Larry Leigh, David Aaron, Dennis Helder, Brian Markham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 175 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 44 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 48 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 19%
Engineering 17 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 53 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,386,678
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#7,872
of 11,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,493
of 354,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#62
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.