↓ Skip to main content

Can measurements of 2HDM parameters provide hints for high scale supersymmetry?

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can measurements of 2HDM parameters provide hints for high scale supersymmetry?
Published in
Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, May 2018
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.97.095018
Authors

Gautam Bhattacharyya, Dipankar Das, M. Jay Pérez, Ipsita Saha, Arcadi Santamaria, Oscar Vives

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#23,381
of 44,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,395
of 342,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#504
of 880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.