The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can measurements of 2HDM parameters provide hints for high scale supersymmetry?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1103/physrevd.97.095018 |
Authors |
Gautam Bhattacharyya, Dipankar Das, M. Jay Pérez, Ipsita Saha, Arcadi Santamaria, Oscar Vives |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,767,513
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#23,969
of 45,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,117
of 346,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#507
of 880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45,147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.