The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
EVANGELICALS, PENTECOSTALS AND POLITICAL REPRESENTATION IN BRAZILIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS (1998-2010)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.17666/329310/2017 |
Authors |
Fabio Lacerda |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 20 | 61% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 9% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,202,879
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais
#10
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,415
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.