Research says: "Cancer isn't really hereditary!" DNA is irrelevant and Epigenetics (our perception) is EVERYTHING! http://t.co/EpcFrIjJUu
Variation in cancer risk among tissues explained by number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/TmqZHV4hRq http://t.co/PB6ZkN0Qey via @moorejh
Most cancers are bad luck, not inherited or environmental. Interesting, quick, accessible read in @ScienceMagazine http://t.co/ALMJ8DchUr
Variation in cancer risk among tissues explained by number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/TmqZHV4hRq http://t.co/PB6ZkN0Qey via @moorejh
a lottery of doom: #cancer lifetime risk correlated with no. stem cell divisions in tissue. some never preventable http://t.co/WEA1Re8UhJ
2/ L'article est paru dans l'une des deux revues qui font la politique scientifique mondiale: http://t.co/vOhRAL8r3a http://t.co/6PdtiT7WwW
this seems like the Neutral Theory for cancer. expect similar backlash from those invested in non-random causes http://t.co/5lGx2qTPNX
@sciencemagazine: Fascinating: Cancer risk = # stem cell divisions >> environment or genes. Need early detection tech http://t.co/2uDk8UI1k9
"tissues with higher populations of stem cells more prone to cancer (R=0.8; R^2=0.65)" http://t.co/6uKJbDpa5N HT: @madamScientist #biology
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions - @sciencemagazine: http://t.co/VPiujbZFnf
Just to what extent is cancer beyond our control? Mostly bad luck? http://t.co/9EV66A2rQG http://t.co/U6vBG8qwlk http://t.co/mb4a4lSfMv
Majority of #cancers are just bad luck http://t.co/wywLQyqZF9
Very intriguing paper suggesting relationship between stem cell division, cancer and random mutations. some room …https://t.co/cD7L9jTY5D
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Here's the actual study of getting cancer being primarily random "bad luck". #Cancer #Cancerfacts- go here for study: http://t.co/u609gAoagw
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
@bowelcancer @CR_UK but have you professionally critiqued this: http://t.co/8JmZlFnnEu http://t.co/qeyFSNZvYu #depressing
Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/7yOgkoff5y
=> RT @EricTopol: Are most types of #cancer due to "bad luck"? http://t.co/ndToUArabG @sciencemagazine http://t.co/5emUaFVwHT
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Random errors occurring during DNA replication in stem cells are a major contributing factor in cancer development http://t.co/YhDMVOb1JD
"@EricTopol: Are most types of #cancer due to "bad luck"? http://t.co/tp2fe9sW9l @sciencemagazine http://t.co/etW64WZeUU" #oncology
http://t.co/D6s59vZmnC this being published is just sad. Please read http://t.co/3yfR05nP2K or TL;DR: https://t.co/OiY9jCMDZJ
"Bad luck" as a cause of cancer http://t.co/IHAeZMXaQc : Still do not forget that many cancers of infectious or toxic origin are preventable
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Random mutations in healthy stem cells - 'bad luck' in cancer http://t.co/MXbjTZODeJ
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/0ZkTVSSMxt
http://t.co/D6s59vZmnC this being published is just sad. Please read http://t.co/3yfR05nP2K or TL;DR: https://t.co/OiY9jCMDZJ
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/x3YAFeK4Px via @NatRevClinOncol
Fundamental relationship between genetic mutations and cancer? Looks like an interesting paper: http://t.co/FZa7WQusHF #Cancer
Science | From AAAS http://t.co/XqizfcRUrc
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/x3YAFeK4Px via @NatRevClinOncol
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
...news article here: http://t.co/TDKxQZDYQc and paper in science: http://t.co/BQfZDTyaqc
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/0ZkTVSSMxt
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Variation in #cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions http://t.co/ev1yDUeijX http://t.co/VCO8nKCp3x
Ara sembla que la majoria de càncers són per mala sort / Most Cancers Due to "Bad Luck" http://t.co/YUZX6N2oKI
癌になると人は「ナゼ?」と思うが、2/3は不運で環境や遺伝因子の寄与は1/3。 組織幹細胞の分裂回数を検討してモデル化 フォーゲルシュタインら http://t.co/6jp9xS1RYy http://t.co/9QChPOnrqd http://t.co/VVQonQQIWs
Risk of Human Cancers & Bad Luck http://t.co/DUwzQeSQG5
the bad luck of #cancer: will the random chance remodel the theory of the hallmarks of cancer? #stemcell http://t.co/CqH8YMKXyl
...poi arriva vogelstein, e manda in fumo anni di ricerca affermando che 2/3 dei tumori compare per caso... http://t.co/CqH8YMKXyl #science
This week - Cancer correlates with stem cell division (http://t.co/EC4pfmpSF5), nanopore battery (http://t.co/tlxZkgfdiJ)
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Science | From AAAS http://t.co/nEehaphxMA
話題になっているサイエンスのがんリスク論文ですが、パッと見での結論だけいうと非常に問題があるか、あるいは意味のない論文だと思います。http://t.co/n3JNFTVtcr
癌になると人は「ナゼ?」と思うが、2/3は不運で環境や遺伝因子の寄与は1/3。 組織幹細胞の分裂回数を検討してモデル化 フォーゲルシュタインら http://t.co/6jp9xS1RYy http://t.co/9QChPOnrqd http://t.co/VVQonQQIWs
Cancer due to #luck rather than lifestyle. http://t.co/SoXePEWl5A Anyway, good luck! @sciencemagazine I can't afford to read the full text.
"only a third of the variation in cancer risk is attributable to environmental factors or inherited predispositions" http://t.co/FhHNygKWfF
"only a third of the variation in cancer risk is attributable to environmental factors or inherited predispositions" http://t.co/FhHNygKWfF
話題になっているサイエンスのがんリスク論文ですが、パッと見での結論だけいうと非常に問題があるか、あるいは意味のない論文だと思います。http://t.co/n3JNFTVtcr
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Are most types of #cancer due to "bad luck"? http://t.co/cbDR5DvNgm @sciencemagazine http://t.co/hCuonIPEh6
VARIATION IN CANCER RISK AMONG TISSUES CAN BE EXPLAINED BY THE NUMBER OF STEM CELL DIVISIONS: http://t.co/tex4H3ZOp1
Bad luck causes way more cancer than environment or heredity http://t.co/pQyVFht1ye via @EdwardTufte
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
Cancer risk variation = measurable bad luck? Tomasetti+Vogelstein,Science 2Jan15: http://t.co/GbebJoZfQo #statistics http://t.co/Si3FmvWHOX
癌になると人は「ナゼ?」と思うが、2/3は不運で環境や遺伝因子の寄与は1/3。 組織幹細胞の分裂回数を検討してモデル化 フォーゲルシュタインら http://t.co/6jp9xS1RYy http://t.co/9QChPOnrqd http://t.co/VVQonQQIWs
話題になっているサイエンスのがんリスク論文ですが、パッと見での結論だけいうと非常に問題があるか、あるいは意味のない論文だと思います。http://t.co/n3JNFTVtcr
http://t.co/OyxBGtLOy2 Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions
For those w/o paywall, here’s the Vogelstein/Tomasetti paper from Science re cancer risk & # of stem cell divisions http://t.co/X7k26y5KGM
話題になっているサイエンスのがんリスク論文ですが、パッと見での結論だけいうと非常に問題があるか、あるいは意味のない論文だと思います。http://t.co/n3JNFTVtcr
Vogelstein'in kotu sans ve rastlantisal mutasyonlardan kanser oluşumu makalesi hakkında bayagi konuşulacak! http://t.co/yFpzrGgMxW
癌になると人は「ナゼ?」と思うが、2/3は不運で環境や遺伝因子の寄与は1/3。 組織幹細胞の分裂回数を検討してモデル化 フォーゲルシュタインら http://t.co/6jp9xS1RYy http://t.co/9QChPOnrqd http://t.co/VVQonQQIWs
Am I the only one thinking the Vogelstein paper in Science misses key concepts in genetics? http://t.co/SsRQIvYhTb
IT BEGINS MT @pmctrawler: Comment on Tomasetti C (2015): http://t.co/cYueWgjmYj
Original: http://t.co/XHbhOCjuDy
Two-thirds of adult cancers largely ‘down to bad luck’ rather than genes ! Check details, A MUST READ ! http://t.co/8AfQumvzIE
Science | From AAAS http://t.co/5XgCmLmsRn
癌になると人は「ナゼ?」と思うが、2/3は不運で環境や遺伝因子の寄与は1/3。 組織幹細胞の分裂回数を検討してモデル化 フォーゲルシュタインら http://t.co/6jp9xS1RYy http://t.co/9QChPOnrqd http://t.co/VVQonQQIWs
Kanker: kwestie van een beetje genetische aanleg, beïnvloed door omgevingsfactoren, maar vooral een hoop domme pech. http://t.co/2oc8O7U5zD
癌になると人は「ナゼ?」と思うが、2/3は不運で環境や遺伝因子の寄与は1/3。 組織幹細胞の分裂回数を検討してモデル化 フォーゲルシュタインら http://t.co/6jp9xS1RYy http://t.co/9QChPOnrqd http://t.co/VVQonQQIWs
Original: http://t.co/XHbhOCjuDy
Diese Arbeit hat es gestern in die Tagesschau (und alle sozialen Netzwerke) geschafft. Die Aussage, die als so... http://t.co/g56xcPzHha
“bad luck” component explains a far greater number of cancers than do hereditary and environmental factors.. http://t.co/NTdInhmBS4