↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Genomics and Proteomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Surface plasmon resonance for proteomics.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Surface plasmon resonance for proteomics.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Chemical Genomics and Proteomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-349-3_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-348-6, 978-1-61779-349-3
Authors

de Mol NJ, Nico J. de Mol, Mol, Nico J.

Abstract

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is a well-established label-free technique to detect mass changes near an SPR surface. For 20 years the benefits of SPR have been proven in biomolecular interaction analysis, including measurements of affinity and kinetics. The emergence of proteomics and a need for high throughput analysis drives the development of SPR systems capable of analyzing microarrays. The use of SPR imaging (also known as SPR microscopy) makes it possible to use multiplexed arrays to follow binding reactions. As SPR only analyzes the binding process, but not the identity of captured molecules on the SPR surface, technologies have been developed to integrate SPR with mass spectrometric (MS) analysis. Such approaches involve the recovery of analytes from the SPR surface and subsequent MALDI-TOF MS analysis, or LC-MS/MS after tryptic digestion of recovered proteins. An approach compatible with SPR arrays is on-chip MALDI-TOF MS, from arrayed spots on an SPR surface. This review describes some exciting developments in the application of SPR to proteomics, using instruments which are on the market already, or are expected to be available in the years to come.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,316
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,242
of 133,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#8
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.