You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating the effect of Japan’s 2004 postgraduate training programme on the spatial distribution of physicians
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-13-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rie Sakai, Hiroshi Tamura, Rei Goto, Ichiro Kawachi |
Abstract |
In 2004, the Japanese government permitted medical graduates for the first time to choose their training location directly through a national matching system. While the reform has had a major impact on physicians' placement, research on the impact of the new system on physician distribution in Japan has been limited. In this study, we sought to examine the determinants of physicians' practice location choice, as well as factors influencing their geographic distribution before and after the launch of Japan's 2004 postgraduate medical training programme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#731
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,429
of 359,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.