The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018
|
---|---|
Published in |
Anesthesiology, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1097/aln.0000000000002043 |
Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 27% |
Spain | 6 | 10% |
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Algeria | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 43 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 17% |
Scientists | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 378 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 47 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 44 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
Researcher | 30 | 8% |
Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
Other | 79 | 21% |
Unknown | 113 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 196 | 52% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 5% |
Unknown | 120 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#673,589
of 26,800,077 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#200
of 6,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,548
of 348,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#4
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,800,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.