↓ Skip to main content

Zic family

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: ZIC3 in Heterotaxy
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
ZIC3 in Heterotaxy
Chapter number 15
Book title
Zic family
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-7311-3_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-107310-6, 978-9-81-107311-3
Authors

Helen M. Bellchambers, Stephanie M. Ware, Bellchambers, Helen M., Ware, Stephanie M.

Abstract

Mutation of ZIC3 causes X-linked heterotaxy, a syndrome in which the laterality of internal organs is disrupted. Analysis of model organisms and gene expression during early development suggests ZIC3-related heterotaxy occurs due to defects at the earliest stage of left-right axis formation. Although there are data to support abnormalities of the node and cilia as underlying causes, it is unclear at the molecular level why loss of ZIC3 function causes such these defects. ZIC3 has putative roles in a number of developmental signalling pathways that have distinct roles in establishing the left-right axis. This complicates the understanding of the mechanistic basis of Zic3 in early development and left-right patterning. Here we summarise our current understanding of ZIC3 function and describe the potential role ZIC3 plays in important signalling pathways and their links to heterotaxy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Materials Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,299,191
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,168
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,006
of 442,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#40
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.