↓ Skip to main content

Zic family

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Cnidarian Zic Genes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cnidarian Zic Genes
Chapter number 2
Book title
Zic family
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-7311-3_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-107310-6, 978-9-81-107311-3
Authors

Michael J. Layden, Layden, Michael J.

Abstract

To understand the ancestral and evolved roles of zic homologs, it is important to reconstruct the putative roles of ancient zic homologs in the animal phylogeny. Most studies of zic genes have been conducted in model systems that are members of the bilaterian phylum. However, two additional phyla have zic homologs encoded in their genomes. The three animal phyla that contain zic homologs all share a common ancestor and collectively are termed the parahoxozoans (cnidarians (corals, sea anemones, and jellyfish), placozoans (Trichoplax adhaerens), and bilaterians (chordates, insects, nematodes, annelids, echinoderms, etc.). In this chapter we briefly discuss our understanding of zic genes in the parahoxozoans with a particular focus on how expression of cnidarian zic homologs in the medusozoan Hydra vulgaris and the anthozoan Nematostella vectensis informs our understanding of the putative ancestral roles zic homologs played in the cnidarian-bilaterian common ancestor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,546,261
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,233
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,700
of 442,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#43
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.