↓ Skip to main content

PF038 小学校算数における乗法の導入問題に関する研究(教授・学習・認知,ポスター発表F)

Overview of attention for article published in Annual convention of the Japanese Association of Educational Psychology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PF038 小学校算数における乗法の導入問題に関する研究(教授・学習・認知,ポスター発表F)
Published in
Annual convention of the Japanese Association of Educational Psychology, March 2017
DOI 10.20587/pamjaep.56.0_683
Authors

上岡 学

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,125,536
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Annual convention of the Japanese Association of Educational Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,071
of 312,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual convention of the Japanese Association of Educational Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them