↓ Skip to main content

Uniform FDG-PET guided GRAdient Dose prEscription to reduce late Radiation Toxicity (UPGRADE-RT): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial with dose reduction to the elective neck in head and…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uniform FDG-PET guided GRAdient Dose prEscription to reduce late Radiation Toxicity (UPGRADE-RT): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial with dose reduction to the elective neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3195-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sven van den Bosch, Tim Dijkema, Martina C. Kunze-Busch, Chris H. J. Terhaard, Cornelis P. J. Raaijmakers, Patricia A. H. Doornaert, Frank J. P. Hoebers, Marije R. Vergeer, Bas Kreike, Oda B. Wijers, Wim J. G. Oyen, Johannes H. A. M. Kaanders

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 39 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Psychology 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 47 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,227,808
of 25,889,720 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,851
of 9,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,662
of 326,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#34
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,889,720 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.