↓ Skip to main content

Angioplasty (versus non surgical management) for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angioplasty (versus non surgical management) for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000017.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerry Fowkes, Ian N Gillespie

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,626,101
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,891
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,039
of 353,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.