The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Growth form distribution and genetic relationships in tree clusters of Pinus flexilis, a bird-dispersed pine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, August 1994
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00324230 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katherine S. Carsey, Diana F. Tomback |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 29% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 47% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 29% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2008.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,674
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,290
of 21,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.