↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptome Data Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Transcriptome Data Analysis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Comparison of Gene Expression Profiles in Nonmodel Eukaryotic Organisms with RNA-Seq
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Microarray Data Analysis for Transcriptome Profiling
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Pathway and Network Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes in Transcriptomes
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 QuickRNASeq: Guide for Pipeline Implementation and for Interactive Results Visualization
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Tracking Alternatively Spliced Isoforms from Long Reads by SpliceHunter
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 RNA-Seq-Based Transcript Structure Analysis with TrBorderExt
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Analysis of RNA Editing Sites from RNA-Seq Data Using GIREMI
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Bioinformatic Analysis of MicroRNA Sequencing Data
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Microarray-Based MicroRNA Expression Data Analysis with Bioconductor
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Identification and Expression Analysis of Long Intergenic Noncoding RNAs
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Analysis of RNA-Seq Data Using TEtranscripts
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Computational Analysis of RNA–Protein Interactions via Deep Sequencing
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Predicting Gene Expression Noise from Gene Expression Variations
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Protocol for Epigenetic Imprinting Analysis with RNA-Seq Data
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Using SINCERA Pipeline
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Mathematical Modeling and Deconvolution of Molecular Heterogeneity Identifies Novel Subpopulations in Complex Tissues
Attention for Chapter 3: Pathway and Network Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes in Transcriptomes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pathway and Network Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes in Transcriptomes
Chapter number 3
Book title
Transcriptome Data Analysis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7710-9_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7709-3, 978-1-4939-7710-9
Authors

Qianli Huang, Ming-an Sun, Ping Yan

Abstract

In recent years, transcriptome sequencing has become very popular, encompassing a wide variety of applications from simple mRNA profiling to discovery and analysis of the entire transcriptome. One of the most common aims of transcriptome sequencing is to identify genes that are differentially expressed (DE) between two or more biological conditions, and to infer associated pathways and gene networks from expression profiles. It can provide avenues for further systematic investigation into potential biologic mechanisms. Gene Set (GS) enrichment analysis is a popular approach to identify pathways or sets of genes that are significantly enriched in the context of differentially expressed genes. However, the approach considers a pathway as a simple gene collection disregarding knowledge of gene or protein interactions. In contrast, topology-based methods integrate the topological structure of a pathway and gene network into the analysis. To provide a panoramic view of such approaches, this chapter demonstrates several recent computational workflows, including gene set enrichment and topology-based methods, for analysis of the DE pathways and gene networks from transcriptome-wide sequencing data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,378,457
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,227
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,513
of 442,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#432
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.