↓ Skip to main content

Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007710.pub3
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Sushant Saluja, Helena O'Flynn, Alessandra Sorrentino, Daniel Leach, Andrew Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,069,712
of 15,482,068 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,417
of 11,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,239
of 279,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,482,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.