↓ Skip to main content

Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007710.pub3
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Sushant Saluja, Helena O'Flynn, Alessandra Sorrentino, Daniel Leach, Andrew Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 22 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#9,127,572
of 17,367,552 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,847
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,540
of 286,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,367,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.