↓ Skip to main content

Long Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 464: Expression Specificity of Disease-Associated lncRNAs: Toward Personalized Medicine
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Expression Specificity of Disease-Associated lncRNAs: Toward Personalized Medicine
Chapter number 464
Book title
Long Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/82_2015_464
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923906-4, 978-3-31-923907-1
Authors

Nguyen, Quan, Carninci, Piero, Quan Nguyen, Piero Carninci

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) perform diverse regulatory functions in transcription, translation' chromatin modification, and cellular organization. Misregulation of lncRNAs is found linked to various human diseases. Compared to protein-coding RNAs' lncRNAs are more specific to organs, tissues, cell types, developmental stages, and disease conditions' making them promising candidates as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and as gene therapy targets. The functional annotation of mammalian genome (FANTOM) consortium utilizes cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) method to quantify genome-wide activities of promoters and enhancers of coding and noncoding RNAs across a large collection of human and mouse tissues' cell types' diseases, and time-courses. The project discovered widespread transcription of major lncRNA classes, including lncRNAs derived from enhancers' bidirectional promoters' antisense lncRNAs' and repetitive elements. Results from FANTOM project enable assessment of lncRNA expression specificity across tissue and disease conditions' based on differential promoter and enhancer usage. More than 85 % of disease-related SNPs are within noncoding regions and are strikingly overrepresented in enhancer and promoter regions, suggestive of the importance of lncRNA loci at these SNP harboring regions to human diseases. In this chapter' we discuss lncRNA expression specificity' review diverse functions of disease-associated lncRNAs' and present perspectives on their potential therapeutic applications for personalized medicine. The future development of lncRNA applications relies on technologies to identify and validate their functions' structures' and mechanisms. Comprehensive understanding of genome-wide interaction networks of lncRNAs with proteins, chromatins, and other RNAs in regulating cellular processes will allow personalized medicine to use lncRNAs as highly specific biomarkers in diagnosis' prognosis, and therapeutic targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,236,953
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#390
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,814
of 266,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.