↓ Skip to main content

Long Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 465: Long Noncoding RNAs as Targets and Regulators of Nuclear Receptors.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Long Noncoding RNAs as Targets and Regulators of Nuclear Receptors.
Chapter number 465
Book title
Long Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/82_2015_465
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923906-4, 978-3-31-923907-1
Authors

Foulds, Charles E, Panigrahi, Anil K, Coarfa, Cristian, Lanz, Rainer B, O'Malley, Bert W, Charles E. Foulds, Anil K. Panigrahi, Cristian Coarfa, Rainer B. Lanz, Bert W. O’Malley

Abstract

Intensive research has been directed at the discovery, biogenesis, and expression patterns of long noncoding RNAs , yet their biochemical functions have remained elusive for the most part. Nuclear receptors that interpret signaling mediated by small molecule hormones play a role in regulating the expression of some long noncoding RNAs. More importantly, these RNAs have also been shown to effect hormone-affected gene transcription regulated by the nuclear receptors. In this chapter, we summarize the current knowledge that has been acquired on hormonal signaling inducing expression of long noncoding RNAs and how they then may act in trans or in cis to modulate gene transcription. We highlight a few of these noncoding RNA molecules in terms of how they may impact hormone-driven cancers. Future directions critical for moving this field forward are presented, with a clear emphasis on the need for better biochemical approaches to address the mechanism of action of these exciting RNAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,291,881
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#600
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,952
of 267,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.