You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Epitope mapping with membrane-bound synthetic overlapping peptides.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 25 |
Book title |
Monoclonal Antibodies
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-992-5_25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-991-8, 978-1-62703-992-5
|
Authors |
Midoro-Horiuti T, Goldblum RM, Terumi Midoro-Horiuti, Randall M. Goldblum, Midoro-Horiuti, Terumi, Goldblum, Randall M. |
Abstract |
Epitope mapping with synthetic overlapping peptides is used for identifying epitopes of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibodies from patient sera (Midoro-Horiuti et al. Mol Immunol 43:509-518, 2006; Ivanciuc et al. J Agric Food Chem 51:4830-4837, 2003; Midoro-Horiuti et al. Mol Immunol 40:555-562, 2003; Wang et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125:695-702, 702.e1-702.e6, 2010). When the mAbs recognize epitopes that are also recognized by patients of interest, they may be useful as surrogates for patient antibodies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,298,293
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,313
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,105
of 313,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#209
of 658 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 658 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.