↓ Skip to main content

Ricin and Shiga Toxins

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 181: Ricin and Shiga Toxins: Effects on Host Cell Signal Transduction.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ricin and Shiga Toxins: Effects on Host Cell Signal Transduction.
Chapter number 181
Book title
Ricin and Shiga Toxins
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/82_2011_181
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-227469-5, 978-3-64-227470-1
Authors

Jandhyala DM, Magun B, Thorpe CM, Dakshina M. Jandhyala, Cheleste M. Thorpe, Bruce Magun, Jandhyala, Dakshina M., Thorpe, Cheleste M., Magun, Bruce

Abstract

Shiga toxins and ricin are potent inhibitors of protein synthesis. In addition to causing inhibition of protein synthesis, these toxins activate proinflammatory signaling cascades that may contribute to the severe diseases associated with toxin exposure. Treatment of cells with Shiga toxins and ricin have been shown to activate a number of signaling pathways including those associated with the ribotoxic stress response, Nuclear factor kappa B activation, inflammasome activation, the unfolded protein response, mTOR signaling, hemostasis, and retrograde trafficking. In this chapter, we review our current understanding of these signaling pathways as they pertain to intoxication by Shiga toxins and ricin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 13%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,187,003
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#55
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,611
of 144,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.