You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay of RNA-RNA Complexes.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
RNA-RNA Interactions
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1896-6_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1895-9, 978-1-4939-1896-6
|
| Authors |
Geunu Bak, Kook Han, Kwang-Sun Kim, Younghoon Lee, Kwang-sun Kim |
| Abstract |
A simple, rapid, and sensitive electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) can be successfully used to analyze RNA-RNA interactions. The EMSA of RNA-RNA complexes can be further used to evaluate the specificity of interactions using competitor RNAs in combination with their mutated versions or nonspecific RNAs, such as yeast tRNA. RNA is simply prepared by in vitro transcription from PCR product templates. Detailed experimental descriptions for EMSA-based analysis of specific RNA-RNA interactions between Sib RNAs and ibs mRNAs as a representative example are presented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 24% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,241,019
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,865
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,626
of 352,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#635
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.