↓ Skip to main content

T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Th1/Th2 Cell Differentiation and Molecular Signals.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Th1/Th2 Cell Differentiation and Molecular Signals.
Chapter number 2
Book title
T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9487-9_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-179486-2, 978-9-40-179487-9
Authors

Yuan Zhang, Yaguang Zhang, Wangpeng Gu, Bing Sun, Zhang, Yuan, Zhang, Yaguang, Gu, Wangpeng, Sun, Bing

Abstract

The distinctive differentiated states of the CD4+ T helper cells are determined by the set of transcription factors and the genes transcribed by the transcription factors. In vitro induction models, the major determinants of the cytokines present during the T-cell receptor (TCR)-mediated activation process. IL-12 and IFN-γ make Naive CD4+ T cells highly express T-bet and STAT4 and differentiate to TH1 cells, while IL-4 make Naive CD4+ T cells highly express STAT6 and GATA3 and differentiated to TH2 cells. Even through T-bet and GATA3 are master regulators for TH1/TH2 cells differentiation. There are many other transcription factors, such as RUNX family proteins, IRF4, Dec2, Gfi1, Hlx, and JunB that can impair TH1/TH2 cells differentiation. In recent years, noncoding RNAs (microRNA and long noncoding RNA) join in the crowd. The leukocytes should migrate to the right place to show their impact. There are some successful strategies, which are revealed to targeting chemokines and their receptors, that have been developed to treat human immune-related diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 22 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,942,562
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,107
of 4,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,089
of 305,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#39
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.