↓ Skip to main content

T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: The Biology and Functions of Th22 Cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Biology and Functions of Th22 Cells.
Chapter number 8
Book title
T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9487-9_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-179486-2, 978-9-40-179487-9
Authors

Jia L, Wu C, Lei Jia, Changyou Wu, Jia, Lei, Wu, Changyou

Abstract

T helper (Th) cells develop from naïve CD4(+) T cells under lineage-specific culture conditions and are nominated by their lineage-specific cytokines. Th22 cells, new players in adoptive immune responses, are identified by the production of interleukin (IL)-22. Plenty of observations are obtained over the past few years indicating that IL-22 is produced by activated T cells including Th22 cells, Th17 cells, Th1 cells, innate lymphoid cells and some nonlymphocytes. IL-22 functions synergistically with IL-17 or tumor necrosis factor (TNF), however, it plays different roles by IL-22/IL-22 receptor signal transductions in pathologic processes, including inflammations, autoimmunity, tumor, and digestive organs damages. In this chapter, we focus on the biology of IL-22, the generation and regulation of Th22 cells, the possible signal pathways that involved in the functions of Th22 cells, as well as the relationship between Th22 cells and various diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 22 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,159,460
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,133
of 5,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,326
of 254,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#8
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.