↓ Skip to main content

Eukaryotic Genomic Databases

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Eukaryotic Genomic Databases'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Identifying Sequenced Eukaryotic Genomes and Transcriptomes with diArk
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 An Introduction to the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Using the Candida Genome Database
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 PomBase: The Scientific Resource for Fission Yeast
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 EuPathDB: The Eukaryotic Pathogen Genomics Database Resource
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Ensembl Genome Browser: Strategies for Accessing Eukaryotic Genome Data
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) Is the International Resource for Information on the Laboratory Mouse
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A Primer for the Rat Genome Database (RGD)
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bovine Genome Database: Tools for Mining the Bos taurus Genome
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Navigating Xenbase: An Integrated Xenopus Genomics and Gene Expression Database
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Using ZFIN: Data Types, Organization, and Retrieval
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 EchinoBase: Tools for Echinoderm Genome Analyses
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Multi-Omics Database for Parasitic Nematodes and Trematodes
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Using WormBase: A Genome Biology Resource for Caenorhabditis elegans and Related Nematodes
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Using WormBase ParaSite: An Integrated Platform for Exploring Helminth Genomic Data
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Using FlyBase to Find Functionally Related Drosophila Genes
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Hymenoptera Genome Database: Using HymenopteraMine to Enhance Genomic Studies of Hymenopteran Insects
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Navigating the i5k Workspace@NAL: A Resource for Arthropod Genomes
Attention for Chapter 13: A Multi-Omics Database for Parasitic Nematodes and Trematodes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Multi-Omics Database for Parasitic Nematodes and Trematodes
Chapter number 13
Book title
Eukaryotic Genomic Databases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7737-6_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7736-9, 978-1-4939-7737-6
Authors

John Martin, Rahul Tyagi, Bruce A. Rosa, Makedonka Mitreva, Martin, John, Tyagi, Rahul, Rosa, Bruce A., Mitreva, Makedonka

Abstract

Helminth.net ( www.helminth.net ) is a web-based resource that was launched in 2000 as simply " Nematode.net " to host and investigate gene sequences from nematode genomes. Over the years it has evolved to become the moniker for a collection of databases: Nematode.net and Trematode.net . These databases host information for 73 nematode (roundworms) and 17 trematode (flatworms) species and serve as backbone for a number of tools that allow users to query slices of the data for multifactorial combinations of species-omics properties. Recent focus has been on inclusion of gene and protein expression data, population genomics and cross-kingdom interactions (metagenomics datasets). This chapter describes the website, the available tools and some of the new features.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Computer Science 2 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,292,415
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#402
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,065
of 442,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#22
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.