↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory Contagion

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 193: Polymorphism of FCGR2A, FCGR2C, and FCGR3B Genes in the Pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Polymorphism of FCGR2A, FCGR2C, and FCGR3B Genes in the Pathogenesis of Sarcoidosis
Chapter number 193
Book title
Respiratory Contagion
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_193
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-930603-2, 978-3-31-930604-9
Authors

M. Typiak, K. Rębała, M. Dudziak, J. M. Słomiński, A. Dubaniewicz

Abstract

We have previously presented evidence that the polymorphism of the FCGR3A gene, encoding the receptor for Fc fragment of immunoglobulin G IIIa (FcγRIIIa) plays a role in the enhancement of circulating immune complexes (CIs) with the occurrence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis heat shock proteins in patients with sarcoidosis (SA). The immunocomplexemia might be caused by decreased affinity of CIs to Fcγ receptors, with the subsequently decreased receptor clearance by immune cells. In the present study we examined whether the polymorphisms of other related genes (FCGR2A, FCGR2C, FCGR3B) encoding other activatory Fcγ receptors, could have a similar effect. To this end, we genotyped 124 patients with sarcoidosis and 148 healthy volunteers using polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers. We revealed a significant decrease in the percentage of the FCGR2A and FCGR2C variants that ensure effective CIs clearance, with a concomitant increase of less functional variants of these genes in Stages I/II, compared with Stages III/IV of SA. There was no aberration in FCGR3B allele/genotype frequencies. We conclude that the FCGR2A and FCGR2C polymorphisms may also contribute to immunocomplexemia present in SA. The assessment of FCGR genes could become a tool in presaging a clinical course of sarcoidosis and in its personalized therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Other 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,555,330
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,324
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,033
of 354,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#165
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.