↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory Contagion

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 183: Treatment Options for Central Sleep Apnea: Comparison of Ventilator, Oxygen, and Drug Therapies
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Treatment Options for Central Sleep Apnea: Comparison of Ventilator, Oxygen, and Drug Therapies
Chapter number 183
Book title
Respiratory Contagion
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_183
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-930603-2, 978-3-31-930604-9
Authors

Josef Yayan, Kurt Rasche

Abstract

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a sleep-related disorder characterized by pauses in breathing during sleep when the brain respiratory network momentarily interrupts transmission of impulses to the respiratory musculature. CSA presents significant problems being an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events and death. There are several available treatment options according to CSA severity. Currently, adaptive servo-ventilation is considered best for CSA patients. The goal of the present study was to retrospectively investigate different treatment methods employed for CSA, such as different modes of ventilation, oxygen therapy, and drugs to determine the most effective one. Data were obtained from hospital records during 2010-2015. The diagnosis of CSA and the optimal treatment method were supported by polysomnography examinations. Devices used during sleep to support breathing included continuous positive airway pressure, bi-level positive airway pressure, or adaptive servo-ventilation. We classified 71 (2.9 %) patients as having CSA from 2,463 patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Of those 71 patients, 54 (76.1 %, 95 % CI 66.2-86.0 %) were male and 17 (23.9 %, 95 % CI 14.0-33.8 %) were female, and they had a mean age of 67.1 ± 14.1. Four (5.6 %) patients underwent a combination therapy, 39 (54.9 %) received a ventilator in proper ventilation mode, 25 (35.2 %) received oxygen therapy, 7 (9.9 %) received medication, and 4 (5.6 %) received no treatment. We conclude that although the majority of patients needed treatment for central sleep apnea, a clear advantage in using ventilators when compared to oxygen therapy or drug therapy could not be found.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Other 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%