The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 538 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1414850 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George Du Toit, Graham Roberts, Peter H Sayre, Henry T Bahnson, Suzana Radulovic, Alexandra F Santos, Helen A Brough, Deborah Phippard, Monica Basting, Mary Feeney, Victor Turcanu, Michelle L Sever, Margarita Gomez Lorenzo, Marshall Plaut, Gideon Lack |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 147 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 51 | 9% |
| Canada | 37 | 7% |
| Spain | 21 | 4% |
| Japan | 16 | 3% |
| Australia | 15 | 3% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| Israel | 6 | 1% |
| Romania | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 46 | 9% |
| Unknown | 185 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 367 | 68% |
| Scientists | 83 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 70 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1447 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 220 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 181 | 12% |
| Researcher | 165 | 11% |
| Other | 152 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 116 | 8% |
| Other | 295 | 20% |
| Unknown | 361 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 521 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 137 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 113 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 82 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 5% |
| Other | 171 | 11% |
| Unknown | 388 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3058. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2024.
All research outputs
#2,221
of 26,800,010 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#152
of 33,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 270,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,800,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.